You see just this morning and yesterday, I turned in two 30+ page reports--one on the cost-effectiveness of HAART (highly active antiretroviral treatment) for HIV/AIDS patients in South Africa (for my economic evaluation class) and another report examining the Duke University Health System medical mishap in which surgical instruments were mistakenly "washed" in hydraulic fluid (for my organizational management class). I really enjoyed these two classes during this half of the term.
Economic evaluation taught me valuable tools that health care officials use to value the "costs and consequences" of various health care interventions. Essentially, we learned the ways to measure the cost-effectiveness of various health care interventions which can commonly include drugs, health promotion programs, health education initiatives, or doing nothing...as that is always an option in the field of health. A lot of people don't particularly like economic evaluation or they think that valuation of such health care interventions is impersonal, but the reality is that health care systems the world over--regardless of provider structure or payment system--are feeling the synergistic squeeze of growing claims and dwindling resources. Therefore, it's important that health systems spend their money wisely and are able to get the best bang for their buck or pound or Euro or what have you.
Feel free to give either of these reports a browse as I'm very happy with them. The economic evaluation report on HAART for AIDS is here while the case study on the Duke hydraulic fluid incident can be found here.
Now, I look forward to enjoying a restful Easter weekend around
0 comments:
Post a Comment